Home
1. A, B, and C are co-owners of a parcel of urban land, they inherited the same from their wealthy uncle. D owns the adjoining land. C donated his portion to E and B sold his portion to F. Has D the right of redemption with respect to the portion of B? In case both A and D want to redeem the portion of C. Who is preferred? First, the co- owner or the owner of adjoining land?
2. X is the owner of a parcel of land less than 1 hectare in area which is bounded by 3 other parcels of agricultural property owned respectively by A, B, and C. X sells his property to Y and A, B, and C apply to redeem. on what basis will one of them be preferred?
3. issued a titled lot which he sold to B, who sold it to C, who obtained a certificate of title in his own name, remained in possession and paid taxes. Later, A manage to obtain from the court an order for the cancellation of C's title and the issuance of a title in her own name, on the false claim that B had resold the property to her but she lost the deed of sale. The court acted as a cadastral court. Six years later, C sued to have this ownership recognized and to cause the title in the name of X who had bought the lot from A. X resisted invoking prescription and the indefeasibility of his title. Who should prevail? ( Our professor give as a hint that C has a better title, and also told as that it has 5 reasons)
Please help me. Thank you
2. X is the owner of a parcel of land less than 1 hectare in area which is bounded by 3 other parcels of agricultural property owned respectively by A, B, and C. X sells his property to Y and A, B, and C apply to redeem. on what basis will one of them be preferred?
3. issued a titled lot which he sold to B, who sold it to C, who obtained a certificate of title in his own name, remained in possession and paid taxes. Later, A manage to obtain from the court an order for the cancellation of C's title and the issuance of a title in her own name, on the false claim that B had resold the property to her but she lost the deed of sale. The court acted as a cadastral court. Six years later, C sued to have this ownership recognized and to cause the title in the name of X who had bought the lot from A. X resisted invoking prescription and the indefeasibility of his title. Who should prevail? ( Our professor give as a hint that C has a better title, and also told as that it has 5 reasons)
Please help me. Thank you
