he was on a final warning due to previous absences as well, thus he was terminated
Is this legal?
Disclaimer: This web site is designed for general information only and does not create attorney-client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for legal advice regarding their individual legal issues.
AyRate wrote:A friend was recently terminated due to unauthorized absence, he had flu for 1 day, and he informed his boss to apply for a sick leave, but his SL was not applied because he was told after a week that he did not have a medical certificate, which no one asked for to apply his SL, and on their company handbook it is not stated that a medical certificate is needed for 1 day of absence, not unless a certificate was asked.
he was on a final warning due to previous absences as well, thus he was terminated
Is this legal?
AyRate wrote:
he was on a final warning due to previous absences as well, thus he was terminated
Is this legal?
council wrote:AyRate wrote:
he was on a final warning due to previous absences as well, thus he was terminated
Is this legal?
Follow-up question:
Was the FWW given because he was also sick during the previous absence? If so, was he told that a medical certificate was needed for any length of sickness?
council wrote:How long has he been working in the company?
was he accorded due process (notice, hearing, decision)?
AyRate wrote:council wrote:AyRate wrote:
he was on a final warning due to previous absences as well, thus he was terminated
Is this legal?
Follow-up question:
Was the FWW given because he was also sick during the previous absence? If so, was he told that a medical certificate was needed for any length of sickness?
here is the progression:
sep - flood,1day, with advice - written warning
oct - allergy attack,1day, no advice - final warning, although no advice for a need for medical certificate per instance was
nov - flu,1day, with advice - termination
can this be counted as gross and habitual?council wrote:How long has he been working in the company?
was he accorded due process (notice, hearing, decision)?
He stayed there for almost a year, yes he was given NTE, hearing, notice of decision
AyRate wrote:Nag file sya sa sena ba tawag dun? nagusap sila at ang sabi sa kanya e ibibigay ang backpay+leaves+13th month+tax refund nya, hindi ba dapat may damages din syang makukuha?
AyRate wrote:Nag file sya sa sena ba tawag dun? nagusap sila at ang sabi sa kanya e ibibigay ang backpay+leaves+13th month+tax refund nya, hindi ba dapat may damages din syang makukuha?
council wrote:SENA = Single Entry Assistance ng DOLE.
SENA prescribes 30-day mandatory conciliation–mediation services to effect fair and speedy settlement of all DOLE cases.
This program provides workers speedy, impartial, inexpensive, and accessible settlement procedure of all labor issues or conflicts to prevent these issues or conflicts from ripening into full-blown disputes.
here is the progression:
sep - flood,1day, with advice - written warning
oct - allergy attack,1day, no advice - final warning, although no advice for a need for medical certificate per instance was given, esp for 1day sick leaves
nov - flu,1day, with advice - termination
can this be counted as gross and habitual?
Free Legal Advice Philippines » FREE LEGAL ADVICE » LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT » Terminated due to unauthorized absence
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum