This is in relation to your letter dated “AUGUST 19, 2011”. The undersigned received the letter SEPTEMBER 01, 2011 15 hours before suppose core group meeting. The undersigned could not attend in good faith because of the reason:
1. The undersigned has a class on September 02, 2011; 1100H-1230H,1800-1730H. between the time the undersigned has appointment with fitness first global city together with his mother and later in the evening will attend an event at CONG’S BALAY MAYNILA.
2. The undersigned points that the meeting is a core group meeting not even personal.
3. The letter is not complete, how can you answer something so vague “incident that happened August 25-26, 2011.”
4. The letter is so conflicting and improper “ I am invited due to an incedent that happened on August 25-26, 2011 while your memo was made and dated on August 19, 2011 and given only 15 hours before the said scheduled meeting.”
5. The incident stated in the letter is not clear and specific maybe because of wrong information or half guess by informants.
Thus due to lack of time of being informed, technicality, personal appointments and class schedule the undersigned could not be available on the said time. Regarding to the “Failure to attend the said meeting would waive your right to be heard”. Your letter is an INVITATION and never failure to attend an INVITATION COULD WAIVE RIGHTS TO BE HEARD this is basic law.
But because of the good record base of what I have heard and seen as of now of the incumbent HEAD OF THE STUDENT AFFAIRS the undersigned is willing to cooperate in the future to end and to give light to issues. With the presence of all concerned (concerned: past officers, past advisers, oic hrm dept, academic dean, even the former OSA if possible) to end this year long grievances.
atty ito yung counter letter ko sa kanila. pero ako naman ay walang bad faith kahit ngcounter ako nakipagusap parin ako sa kanila yun na nga suspended ako