Free Legal Advice Philippines
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Free Legal Advice Philippines

Disclaimer: This web site is designed for general information only and does not create attorney-client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for legal advice regarding their individual legal issues.

Log in

I forgot my password




You are not connected. Please login or register

Case Digests (Ethics,Political Law,Labor,CrimLaw,Remedial)

+11
patitoy
bgmiraflor
sorskie
dyani luweedyi
sierra tres
rjn
gamanikong
gilda
louie_yuleng
gorio228
littlemissfuturelawyer
15 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

littlemissfuturelawyer

littlemissfuturelawyer
Arresto Menor

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

gorio228


Arresto Menor

thanks a lot

louie_yuleng

louie_yuleng
Arresto Menor

thank you po Smile

gilda


Arresto Menor

thank you po

gamanikong


Arresto Mayor

Maraming Salamat Po! Very Happy

rjn


Arresto Menor

salamat po dito Smile

sierra tres


Arresto Menor

salamat kaayo...

dyani luweedyi


Arresto Menor

salamat din po Laughing

sorskie


Arresto Menor

thank you

bgmiraflor


Arresto Menor

thank you so much...

patitoy


Arresto Menor

many thanks po! Godbless!

ferdinand


Arresto Menor

God bless you po!!!!

andyace


Arresto Menor

hi! ala ako mahanap digest nito so share ko po mine. i hope it will help..

Admin Case Digest

Divinagracia v. Consolidated Broadcasting System, Inc. (cancellation of certificates of public convenience of telecommunication legislative franchisees)

Administrative agency involved – National Telecommunications Commission (NTC)

Facts:
Divinagracia, alleging to be the actual and beneficial owner of 12% of Consolidated Broadcasting System, Inc (CBS) and People’s Broadcasting Service, Inc. (PBS), filed two complaints with the NTC against CBS and PBS praying for the cancellation of all the provisional authorities or Certificates of Public Convenience (CPCs) as well as the legislative franchise issued to CBS (R.A. 7582) and PBS (R.A. 7477) on account of the alleged violation of the conditions set therein, to wit: failure to comply with the mandated public offering of at least 30% of their common stocks. NTC dismissed the complaints. While positing that it had full jurisdiction to revoke or cancel CPCs for violations or infractions of the terms and conditions embodied therein, the complaints constitute collateral attacks on the legislative franchise and that NTC is not competent to render judgment on such issue.

Issue:
WoN the NTC has the power to cancel the CPCs it has issued to legislative franchisees.

Held:
The Radio Control Act in 1931 requires broadcast stations to obtain a legislative franchise and such requirement was not repealed by E.O. 546 which established the NTC, the administrative agency which has regulatory jurisdiction over broadcast stations. When the Congress grants a legislative franchise, it is the legal obligation of the NTC to facilitate the operation by the franchisee of its broadcast station and since public administration of the airwaves is a highly technical function, the Congress has delegated to the NTC the task of administration over the broadcast spectrum. The licensing power of the NTC arises from the necessary delegation by Congress of legislative power geared towards the orderly exercise by franchisees of the rights granted them by Congress.

The life and authority of an administrative agency emanates solely from an Act of Congress, and its faculties confined within the parameters set by the legislative branch of government. Even as the NTC is vested with the power to issue CPCs to broadcast stations, it is not expressly vested with the power to cancel such CPCs, or otherwise prevent broadcast stations with duly issued franchises and CPCs from operating radio and television stations. Although the Radio Control Act empowered the government through the then Secretary of Public Works and Communications to suspend or revoke issued licenses, the NTC did not retain such power when it was established by E.O. 546 to replace the previous regulatory agencies. Said E.O. 546 promulgated by then President F. Marcos in the exercise of his legislative power withheld from it the authority to cancel licenses and CPCs.

-andylim0422

redrider0404

redrider0404
Prision Correccional

thanks..

sumeragi


Arresto Menor

thank you very much.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum