estafa, forgery, falsification of documents

hi atty.!

ask lng po sana: what will happen to the person po, nag work sa isang lending company, then created multiple accts (hindi po sinabay lahat)with no collaterals but with the permission of the manager. thing is, na delinquent po yung mga accts. audit came and asked each employee for confirmation regarding the said delinquent accts. the employee concerned admitted and confirmed that those accounts were created by the employee itself (the names and persons are existing) and all the documents presented based on their profiles were forged (signature). the committee said the employee should have a collateral that could equate the total amount of loan granted. wala pong kahit isang kusing na collateral yung employee.

i'd say there is basis to file charges of estafa against him.

if there's admission on the act atty, should estafa still be charged against the employee? for now, the employee is being suspended (preventive). can he file a resignation? what are some other actions that could be done for him in order not to be summoned or be issue a warrant of arrest or publish in the newspaper.

he has to enter into an agreement that he will pay and they will waive all actions if he is able to do so.

what if atty, the clients are existing, pero wala sila talagang business and nagkataon naging deliquent yung accounts nila, but they are the one who produced the necessary documents. and aside from this, sila rin ang personal na nagreceive ng money and nagsign ng promissory note. Meron pa rin po bang basis ang employer para magfile ng estafa against the employee? and aside from estafa may iba po bng case na pwedeng ifile against sa employee?

ms. dee, what is the nature of the work of the company and of the employee?

she is one of the charge in conducting credit investigation prior to approval of loan on a bank.

ang nagrereceive po ng money ay yung nagloan and meron promissory note at the same time my co-maker din po na kasama pag narelease na yung pera...

thank you atty.

the employer has to prove that there was connivance between the borrower and the credit investigator

Ang malaking pagkakamali lang po ng credit investigator ay ang hindi pagcconduct ng thorough investigation, nagtiwala siya sa mga ibingay na documents sa kanya. But ang pera ay napunta sa nagloan atty.

estafa pa rin po ba ang case sa gnun pagkakamali?

maraming salamat atty sa pagsagot sa mga katanungan ko atty.

that will be the CI's defense. again :

the employer has to prove that there was connivance between the borrower and the credit investigator

atty. ask q lng po kc ung mom q nkasuhan ng estafa dahil nag panggap siyang sss pensioner, dahil d2 nakaloan xa ng 15k...nkabyad nman sya ng 1 hulog amounting to 5k..pero nagfile ng case ung kabilang party..umattend nman ang mom q sa fiscal tpos dun sinabihan xa na mgbayad ebery 15th of the month staring july, 2011..cnunoc nya rin un..at ngaun ngang august 15 bglang may dumating na warrant of arrest..willing nman magbayad ang mama q.ano po bng dapat nmin gwin..

obviously, she didn't fulfill the agreement. she should focus on filing bail so that she will not be arrested.