Kindly be patient enough to enlighten me on the following questions:
Context: NBI Complaint Procedure
When is a complaint considered filed? Is it on the day that the complaint was made? If it is filed on the day the complaint was made, is it necessary that a report of the complaint and/or a complaint affidavit IMMEDIATELY be prepared, signed and executed? What happens when a complaint was made on a particular day, say January 1, 2010, but the actual complaint affidavit is only prepared, signed and executed on a different date, say February 1, 2010, and subsequently furnished to the recipient of the complaint? Can this be considered as being part of the normal complaint procedure or can it be considered as HIGHLY IRREGULAR and a violation of normal procedures? If a considerable lapse of time is allowed between the moment a complaint is made and that of the day a complaint is actually prepared, signed and executed, it is normal and acceptable? What are the legal and procedural grounds in saying so? If it is highly irregular, will this OVERTURN the presumption of regularity in government acts and procedures? How?
Thank you.
Mel
Context: NBI Complaint Procedure
When is a complaint considered filed? Is it on the day that the complaint was made? If it is filed on the day the complaint was made, is it necessary that a report of the complaint and/or a complaint affidavit IMMEDIATELY be prepared, signed and executed? What happens when a complaint was made on a particular day, say January 1, 2010, but the actual complaint affidavit is only prepared, signed and executed on a different date, say February 1, 2010, and subsequently furnished to the recipient of the complaint? Can this be considered as being part of the normal complaint procedure or can it be considered as HIGHLY IRREGULAR and a violation of normal procedures? If a considerable lapse of time is allowed between the moment a complaint is made and that of the day a complaint is actually prepared, signed and executed, it is normal and acceptable? What are the legal and procedural grounds in saying so? If it is highly irregular, will this OVERTURN the presumption of regularity in government acts and procedures? How?
Thank you.
Mel