kasal versus live-in

here is another thing na hindi ko maintindihan,
ang alam ko kahit 18 na ang babae, hindi pa rin sya pwede pakasal without ung pagpirma yata ng guardian nya, tama po ba ito, until what age nga po un na she needs approval of a guardian?
so kung hindi pwede pakasal ang isang 18 na babae, why is it pwede sya makipag live in without the approval of her guardian?
bakit at anong batas ang nagsasabi na kailangan pa ang approval ng guardian gayung when she is 18 pwede na syang magdecide for herself

1. The babae you mean in this case is 18 yrs old right? The laws says, Any person who reach 18 years of age upwards can contract a marriage (not to mention walang sabit ha), provided that she avails the consent of her parents or guardian. Kung walang proper consent from the parents or guardian, the marriage is valid until annulled. of course, the consent will be reduce into writing in a sworn statement or affidavit.

2. Pwde ho magpakasal yung babae, as what ive said. bsta 18 years old and above.

3. The laws says, pag 18 yrs old but below 21 ang isa or both magkasintahan, pwde na ho silang magpakasal basta with CONSENT po from the parents or guardian, pag 21 yrs old and below 25 ang isa or both na magkasintahan, kailangan pa rin ng ADVICE galing ho sa parents or guardian.

At kung ayaw naman magbigay ng CONSENT or ADVICE ang parents or guardian (baka pangit yung isa or baka langit at lupa ang gap nila. hehehe) isasama po yan sa affidavit ang dahilan kung bakit ho ayaw magbgay ng CONSENT or ADVICE ang partido ng ikakasal.

ty sa info endless,
1) so pag 18 to 21, kailangan ng consent, ito ay written, and kapag 21 to 25,kailangan pa rin pala ng advise, bago sakin to a, ano ung advise na un, written pa rin na kailangang pirmahan ng guardian
2) madalas ko mabasa kahit dito ung IMO, ano meaning nun
3) mabusisi pala pag magpapakasal, eh ung orig na tanong ko, bakit pag live in hindi na kailangan ng consent consent or advise na yan, walang ganito sa live in diba, provided atleast 18 ung dalawa, eh di gagawin na lang nung magkasintahan live in na lang kc mabusisi ang kasal eh, di kaya masama epekto nyang maraming requirments

i think it's a good thing that there are requirements. it allows people to fully decide on getting married. if it's too easy, then people will no longer reflect on the fact that it's a contract of permanent union.

just to add, living in is not prohibited by law but neither is it encouraged. nevertheless, the degree of recognition of living is that the property relations are regulated by law.

1)ok malinaw na po, pero ano po ung :
the degree of recognition of living is that the property relations are regulated by law

ano po ung property relations na regulated by law?

2)and second tanong po, dun sa 9262, nabasa ko po ito eh,dun sa psychological violence, may nabangit po dun na:
It includes causing or allowing the victim to witness the physical, sexual or psychological abuse of a member of the family to which the victim belongs, or to witness pornography in any form

ang ibig po sa sabihin ay u should not allow the girl to watch any porno video, ganun po ba un?

3)again, regarding 9262, halimbawa may gf ka or live in partner, tapos nahuli kang nagbibisyo, nag away kayo at nagresulta para hiwalayan mo sya ,tapusin na ang relasyon nyo, pwede ka ba nyang kasuhan ng 9262 kc psychological harm un, or if may valid reason ka para istop ang relationship nyo, nagresulta ng deprssion ni babae,emotional pain on her part, guilty ka ba nun ng violation ng 9262?
may nabangit din po kc dun sa law na mental infidelity,wala namang ganun ah, baka marital infidelity,kulang yata sa budget ang mga mambabatas kaya mali mali minsan ang pagkasulat, o baka sobra sila sa budget

4)dun naman po sa anti child porn law, what if sa isang scene, isang sex scene of two adults, eh nakunan sa screen na may isang batang nanunuod sa couple having sex, can this be considered child porno

5)lastly,
nabasa ko sa anti child porn law :
The work taken as a whole imbued within its context, manner or presentation, intention and culture, lascivious, literary, artistic, political and scientific value.

ibig po ba sabihin, maging ung mga taong bundok na hubot hubad na usually napapanuod natin sa discovey channel, ito po ba ay bawal din, if so, why nasa cable

yan lang po, and pasensya na kung marami akong tanong, wala po kc siguro magawa kc vacation ako now, sa mga darating na araw i wil be busy na so no more internet masyado, ung ibang friend ko na nagpapatanong, iniingatan ko naman po na maging accurate ako sa pagtransmit ng info
i hope hindi ako nakabigat sa mga tanong ko, i know naman na being lawyers u do and sanay kayong magbasa ng katakot takot na kaso, salamat po

1) https://legal.forumtl.com/free-legal-advice-f27/the-grounds-of-co-ownership-in-a-common-law-relationship-t1998.htm

2) what kind of jerk would make a girl watch porn? yes, ganun.

3)paghihiwalay leading to depression, by itself should not be covered. it depends on the bisyo.

haha, i saw that mental infidelity also and went berserk. i found out that is a typographical error on the copy issued by the OP. the copy issued by congress and can be found on the site of the ncrfw is "repeated infidelity."

4 - 5) you have to take the whole movie into consideration, not just one scene. the law even states that in "taken as a whole". a child witnessing a sexual act in a movie is just one scene and if the movie is taken in its entirety, i doubt it was intended to be lascivious.

as i've said earlier, the definition of porn is still a great debate.

a simple, but not legal, standard you can use is, taken as a whole, was the intent of the material just to turn you on? did you like watching them taong gubat?