involved: Brgy. Tanod and a Police Auxiliary Unit (PAU) supervised by local PNP, in short police ally or asset.
tool: 38 snub nose owned by the Brgy. Tanod.
time and date: 1:00 A.M., July 28, 2009.
where: inside session room of brgy. hall.
witness: no direct witness.
evidences: only circumstantial evidences and medico-legal of NBI and Medico-legal of certain hospital suggesting no suicide.
evidences for suicide angle: no evident basis that will justify the commission of suicide.
Narration: the victim and the brgy. tanod was the only person when the alleged suicide incident was committed inside the session room of a certain brgy. hall.
the brgy. tanod informed suicide incident to a local pnp on duty.
on the entire police investigation comes up cited in favor of the suspect brgy tanod only that it was suicide though there were no crime scene technician or SOCO processed the crime scene and the deceased that should support.
Question: if murder was committed by the brgy. tanod and there is willful intent to cover up committed by the policemen in attending to the alleged suicide incident, is cover up conspiracy or accessory to the crime?