Free Legal Advice Philippines
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Free Legal Advice Philippines

Disclaimer: This web site is designed for general information only and does not create attorney-client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for legal advice regarding their individual legal issues.

Log in

I forgot my password




You are not connected. Please login or register

Free Legal Advice Philippines » FREE LEGAL ADVICE » FAMILY AND MARRIAGE » ung peeping incident ba inquesable sa prosecutor?

ung peeping incident ba inquesable sa prosecutor?

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

invest ko to


Arresto Menor

pag nanilip ba puedeng i inquest sa prosecutor? ano po magiging kaso niya?unjust vexation po? inquesable ba ang unjust vexation?

tsi ming choi


Reclusion Perpetua

Inquest, the counterpart of preliminary investigation in case the accused was apprehended without Warrant of arrest, as a rule is mandatory only, when the crime commited is punishable by atleast 4yrs, 2months and 1 day.

Which means na kung ang crimen na nacommit ng accused ay makukulong sya for atleast 4yrs, 2months and 1 day, then inquest ay kinakailangan.

Sa palagay ko hinde naman aabot sa 4yrs ang pagkakakulong kung sampaan ka ng unjust vexation. So inquest is not necessary.

Maybe for unjust vexation or acts of lasciviousness will do, depending sa appreciation ng fiscal dyan.

attyLLL


moderator

by practice, almost all prosecutors conduct PI for all crimes and direct filing is discouraged.

if arrested without warrant, inquest is proper procedure.

so the answer is yes, inquest was proper for unjust vexation through peeping

https://www.facebook.com/BPOEmployeeAdvocate/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Free Legal Advice Philippines » FREE LEGAL ADVICE » FAMILY AND MARRIAGE » ung peeping incident ba inquesable sa prosecutor?

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum