Better remedy for a capitalist partner

Greetings.
I am here to ask for your help concerning business law.
Your opinion upon the subject matter will be gladly appreciated.

The issue is:
Which is a better remedy for the capitalist partners in case the
industrial partner engages in a business for himself in violation of
Article 1789 of the Civil Code of the Philippines -
a) EXCLUSION FROM THE FIRM WITH DAMAGES
or
b) AVAILMENT OF THE BENEFITS OBTAINED BY SAID INDUSTRIAL PARTNER WITH DAMAGES

I was assigned with the "Exclusion from the firm with damages" with "practicality" as my parameter and I must defend my ground with it. Please let me here your opinion in favor of my side. Thank you for your utmost kindness.

Greetings.
I am here to ask for your help concerning business law.
Your opinion upon the subject matter will be gladly appreciated.

The issue is:
Which is a better remedy for the capitalist partners in case the
industrial partner engages in a business for himself in violation of
Article 1789 of the Civil Code of the Philippines -
a) EXCLUSION FROM THE FIRM WITH DAMAGES
or
b) AVAILMENT OF THE BENEFITS OBTAINED BY SAID INDUSTRIAL PARTNER WITH DAMAGES

I was assigned with the "Exclusion from the firm with damages" with "practicality" as my parameter and I must defend my ground with it. Please let me here your opinion in favor of my side. Thank you for your utmost kindness.[/quote]

i'm sure research will help in answering homework