I am a call center supervisor for a multi-LOB program. The LOB i handle happens to be specialized, as there are only 10 agents and I am the lone sup. Back in Feb, I was told of the possibility of my LOB being pulled out. Before end of Feb, I was told that instead of pulling out, the client decided to reduce 90% of the call volume w/c would take effect 3/19. On 3/20, HR along with my manager and director advised me that I would be put on floating status unpaid effective 3/25.
I am questioning the legality of their notice due to the following:
1. Call volume reduction is forecasted ahead of time. A contingency plan should have been put in place to ensure that my work within the company is continuous, such as an account transfer. I was advised of the decision to put me on floating status less than a week from the effective date, thus decreasing my chances of getting transferred at the soonest possible time.
2. I am a graduate of the company's OM prep series, a program designed to help prepare a selection of qualified supervisors for managerial roles & responsibilities. Graduating from this program means you are next in line for a promotion when an opening comes up.
An opening for manager in our Iloilo site did come up a few months ago, and when my superior advised me about this, I politely declined. My family is based here, I have an 8 month old daughter and having recently moved to a new apartment, I also have contractual obligations to it. Moving was not a possibility or option for now.
When I was informed of the decision to put me on float, I was offered to move to Iloilo even though they knew it was something I would not even consider. If moving there was a consideration, I simply could have applied for that manager post months ago.
3. Despite a number of supervisors from our account with pending resignations, I was advised that the account was actually staffed correctly in respect to supervisor-agent ratio & proportion.
On March 28, 2015, I saw an ad on the JobStreet website about Startek actively pooling for supervisor openings.
4. Immediately after the notice was served to me, my badge access to the production floor was deactivated. I was not informed by Mr. Endrina during the entire time we were discussing the notice. This was even though I still had my belongings inside the area.
5. Exercising management prerogative should still be within the means of the labor code. Needless to say, if I am not subject to any action due to business closure, poor performance, failure to perform my duties as a supervisor, attendance issues, any violation of the company's policies, etc., then it is also the company's responsibility to make sure my source of income is uninterrupted.