give me a clear answer pls.

ikinasal si babae (1999) she was 21 that time and the guy is 18. just a civil weding sa city hall. no seminars attended and no cenomar requirements. (maybe no need that time?)and according to her.. its a loveless marriage. tumanaw lng ng utang na loob sa magulang nung lalake dahil sa pag tulong sa kanya nung time na nag aaral sya sa college.

after a 3 years living in together as husband and wife. they blessed to have a 2 children. but? she really cant learned to love this guy for so many reasons. and she cant even feel proud of him. dahil sandal sa magulang at sa pera ng magulang yung lalake, infact, graduate yung lalake and liscens teacher. pero hndi nagagamit and instead. isa syang trafic patola sa kalsada. according nga kase sa babae. during school days eh hndi naman nag aral mabuti yung lalake at sya nga gumagawa nung mga assignements and school proj. and even sa liscensure exam eh sya din ang gumawa ng paraan para maka pasa yung lalake.(kopya) it can consider physcho incapacity right? anyway. back to isue..!

after 3 years living in together as husband and wife? the girl didnt learn to love this guy for so many reasons. til she decided to run and hide and leave her husband together with her daugter. for almost a decade she didnt comunicate to her husband and live alone with her daughter. now.. if ever this girl found a true love now. (naks) at kung sakaling kumilos yung lalake to file a civil case againts her.? malakas ba ang kaso nung lalake? after a decade or even decade na ang lumipas? what are the posible defense na pwdeng gamitin nung babae to defnd her self? is there any posible ground na void or pwdeng ma nulify yung kasal nya sa una? and according to her.. during there times as husabnd and wife. nag ka afair sa iba ang lalake, isa sa dahilan why she hate this guy. and parang happy go lucky lng dahil nga nag iisang anak at may ilang ari-arian ang magulang na pwdeng iwanan sa kanya.

mod.jd888 already give me a very nice advice and some things to do. and i really appriciate it.

is there any opinions and solution from the others? if there is? pls response to this post.

Ill start with the

sources of obligation (Art 1157)
1. law (family code)
....

Jumping to

family code
Art. 68. The husband and wife are obliged to live together, observe mutual love, respect and fidelity, and render mutual help and support.
... unhappy wife failed miserably in this obligation.
Art. 69. The husband and wife shall fix the family domicile. In case of disagreement, the court shall decide.
... unhappy wife left the home, the law is clear both of them shall fix the family domicile and not left to the discretion of the wife. again the unhappy wife failed miserably.

The court may exempt one spouse from living with the other if the latter should live abroad or there are other valid and compelling reasons for the exemption.

However, such exemption shall not apply if the same is not compatible with the solidarity of the family.

... unhappy wife cannot throw the exemption unless it not compatible with the solidarity of the family.

Art. 70. The spouses are jointly responsible for the support of the family. The expenses for such support and other conjugal obligations shall be paid from the community property and, in the absence thereof, from the income or fruits of their separate properties. In case of insufficiency or absence of said income or fruits, such obligations shall be satisfied from the separate properties.
.... kaya nga jointly responsible, unhappy wife iiwan si kawawang husband.. tsk tsk tsk...

Art. 71. The management of the household shall be the right and the duty of both spouses. The expenses for such management shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of Article 70.
.... unhappy wife has the duty in the management of the household pati paglalaba o pagluluto o pamamalantsa, pag iniwan sa husband yan naku patay tayo nian.

Art. 72. When one of the spouses neglects his or her duties to the conjugal union or commits acts which tend to bring danger, dishonor or injury to the other or to the family, the aggrieved party may apply to the court for relief.
.... unhappy wife opens a floodgate of cases to be filed against her by the husband. kawawa naman si husband dito...

Art. 73. Either spouse may exercise any legitimate profession, occupation, business or activity without the consent of the other. The latter may object only on valid, serious, and moral grounds.

In case of disagreement, the court shall decide whether or not:
(1) The objection is proper; and
(2) Benefit has occurred to the family prior to the objection or thereafter. If the benefit accrued prior to the objection, the resulting obligation shall be enforced against the separate property of the spouse who has not obtained consent.
The foregoing provisions shall not prejudice the rights of creditors who acted in good faith.
... ang sabi ng batas is allow to exercise the profession but it does not mean that she gets the better job with better income and the husband has the lesser income, she has in a better position to control, it is not proper and it is against public policy.

For criminal liability, unhappy wife could be charged of adultery and abandonment under RPC.

tnx for the response shad.

after i read. it seems like kung paiiralin ang sinsabing batas at tama daw ayun sa mata ng lipunan? ng dahil sa sagradong kasal na tinatawag? the unhappy wife will be remain as unhappy forever for the rest of her life. or else? run and hide and escape, to seek happiness and make things alright after the mistake during her time to be with the wrong person. but face the risk and consinquences..

very well..

anyway tnx sa resp:)

its the things that the wife must do after her marriage. but how about the things she must? once she failed and seeking happines. coz no one wants to be unhappy for the rest of there lives.