Free Legal Advice Philippines
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Free Legal Advice Philippines

Disclaimer: This web site is designed for general information only and does not create attorney-client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for legal advice regarding their individual legal issues.

Log in

I forgot my password




You are not connected. Please login or register

Bill of Rights

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Bill of Rights Empty Bill of Rights Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:36 pm

EmilyV


Arresto Menor

I've got a Moot Court problem here, and I'm not a Law student, just a Psychology major with a Political Science class. I'm just gonna state the first part of the problem: In 2011, the NBI got a tip from a private concerned citizen about a shabu laboratory in Lapu-Lapu, province of Cebu. Few days thereafter, NBI started surveillance in the alleged Shabu laboratory WITHOUT court order.

Now I'm on the Comission of Human Rights and we argue that the surveillance without court order violates Sec 3 Art 3 (Bill of Rights) Right to Privacy. Is this correct? Did it really violate the Right to Privacy?

2Bill of Rights Empty Re: Bill of Rights Fri Jun 20, 2014 6:02 pm

openchord30


Arresto Menor

No. there was no violation of Section 3, art III. the surveillance was done in accordance with their functions, to investigate possible commission of a crime. NBI is not required to get a court order to do their job. furthermore section 3 of art III pertains to privacy of communication and correspondence. the surveillance (assuming there was no wiretapping) does not violate the law.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum